In the
short story "The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas", Ursula Le Guin uses
the symbol of a child to symbolize injustice and the way the child is treated to
represent selfishness. She also addresses the unnerving reality that we
often accept unjust affairs merely because everyone else does. The only
people who refuse to accept the treatment of the child are the ones who walk
away from Omelas-- the characters which represent the people in the world who
question authority when they think something isn't right. The ones who
walk away represent those of us who are unwilling to turn a blind eye, and
would rather give up all our wealth than be part of a corrupt community.
The
child in the closet symbolizes injustice and inhumanity. All of the citizens of Omelas seem to have
accepted the idea that their prosperity depends solely on the misery of that
single child. The child is kept alone in
a dark, disgusting closet, and the citizens of Omelas are forbidden from
helping it or showing it any kindness because “if it were
cleaned and fed and comforted. . .in that day and hour all the prosperity and
beauty and delight of Omelas would wither and be destroyed” (Le Guin 601). In this quotation, Le Guin portrays that the
citizens of Omelas firmly believe that their wealth is worth the suffering of
an innocent child.
The way
the child is treated represents a kind of selfishness that one could say is
partially driven by the will to conform.
Le Guin implies that the citizens would be a lot less likely to accept
the situation if they were not surrounded by an entire community of people who
encourage it. This is expressed in the
quotation “To exchange all the goodness and grace of every life in Omelas for
that single, small improvement: to throw away the happiness of thousands for
the chance of the happiness of one: that would be to let guilt within the walls
indeed” (601). Seeing as guilt is highly
discouraged in Omelas, the citizens are being taught that it would be immoral
to help the child.
However,
not everyone in Omelas is willing to accept this mindset. The ones who walk away from Omelas are the
ones who refuse to take part in an unjust community, and represent those of us
who question authority and are not willing to comply with a community's norms
if we find them immoral. Most people are
upset about the child at first, but learn to accept it. However, “at times one of the adolescent
girls or boys who go to see the child does not go home to weep or rage, does
not, in fact, go home at all. Sometimes also a man or woman much older
falls silent for a day or two, and then leaves home. These people go out
into the street, and walk down the street alone. They keep walking, and
walk straight out of the city of Omelas, through the beautiful gates" (Le
Guin 602). We, as people, cannot run
into the world and save every single person who needs help. What Le Guin
is encouraging us to do is to stop contributing to the selfish and cruel nature
of our communities. The ones who walk away “seem to know where they are
going" (Le Guin 602). I think that Le Guin is telling us that we all
have an innate sense of right and wrong, it's just a question of whether we
choose to ignore our morals or follow them.
In
conclusion, Ursula Le Guin wrote "The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas"
to teach us about injustice, selfishness, and morality. Selfishness can
prevent us from doing the right thing, especially when you mix it with the will
to conform. However, we must listen to our ethics and do what we feel is
right, not what everyone else is doing.
oh
ReplyDeleteWhy did they just leave and not even tried to rescue the child? They left the corrupt society but did not bother to make it better. Not very brave or noble.
ReplyDeleteIf they had taken the child, every other citizen would have suffered along with them. In this way the only person that they are directly causing harm to is themselves, as they walk away from the greatess happiness they will ever know.
Deleteshut ur cunt
Deleteobviously the child was really oresome
DeleteSuicide, though it may require considerable fortitude to go through, is neither brave nor noble. They are the ones who leave to "go towards...a place even less imaginable to most of us than the city of happiness".
ReplyDeleteThey see a situation they can not bear and find themselves unable to live with it and unable (or perhaps, to their horror, unwilling) to do anything about it and so quietly remove themselves from the equation.
I've only just finished reading the story for the first time and this is my interpretation of the walkers.