Showing posts with label Things Fall Apart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Things Fall Apart. Show all posts

Thursday, February 6, 2014

The Lion Project

Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe and The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton are two texts that challenge the single-story of two different groups: Africans and Teenagers.  Things Fall Apart is a story about the colonization of Africa in the late 1800s, while The Outsiders is story about a gang of teenagers in the 1960s.  Though they may seem different, they’re quite similar in that they’re both stereotyped in a way that makes them seem like less than they really are .  Adults think they’re smarter and better than teenagers in the same way that the white men think themselves superior to the Africans .  Both stories include texts written by the protagonists’ “superiors” that exploit their stereotypes and perpetuate their single stories.
One thing the Africans’ single story and teenagers’ single story have in common is that they’re both viewed  as being juvenile and unsophisticated.  Strangely enough, Okonkwo, the protagonist of Things Fall Apart, doesn’t do much to challenge the stereotype.  He doesn’t care much for words because “he [has] a slight stammer” (Achebe 4) and therefore uses violence instead of language to convey his feelings, which is viewed as a primitive and barbaric form of communication.  However, Achebe makes it clear that not everyone in the village is like Okonkwo.  Achebe writes that “Among the Ibo people the art of conversation is regarded very highly, and proverbs are the palm-oil with which words are eaten” (Achebe 7).  This completely refutes the idea that everyone in Africa is primitive and unsophisticated—most of them are eloquent speakers and utilize beautiful metaphors to portray their points.  Unfortunately, the white men are blind to this in a similar way that adults can often be blind to the intelligence of teenagers. 
The characters in both authors’ works exhibit a variety of different personality types—some, like Dallas Winston in The Outsiders, dropped out of school and are doing things like “[getting] arrested, [getting] drunk, [riding] in rodeos, [lying], [cheating], [stealing], [rolling] drunks, [and jumping] small kids” (Hinton 11).  Similarly to Achebe, Hinton creates a character that completely embodies his stereotype, which is because she isn’t trying to deny the single story—she’s merely saying that it’s incomplete , especially when it comes to characters like Ponyboy and Johnny.  Like the white men think that the Africans are dumb, “[Johnny’s] teachers [think] that [he’s] just plain dumb.  But he [isn’t]” (75).  Ponyboy and Johnny have a deep appreciation for literature, and are able to have completely mature, sophisticated conversations analyzing certain works such as “Nothing Gold Can Stay” and Gone With the Wind.  As Ponyboy discusses these works with Johnny, he realizes how much smarter he is than everyone thinks, and “it [amazes him] how Johnny [can] get more meaning out of some of the stuff in there than [he can]” (75).  Both Chinua Achebe and S.E. Hinton portray the diversity within these characters’ respective communities and convey that one can’t assume poorly of an entire group because not everyone in the group is the same.
One of the most tragic parts of both texts is how oblivious the other parties (the imperialists and the adults) are to anything outside the single story.  In Things Fall Apart, the District Commissioner has been given the amazing opportunity to observe the beauty and sophistication of the culture and the Ibo people, but instead chooses to focus solely on why they’re simple and savage The last paragraph of the story is spent with him discussing the book he’s going to write about his experience colonizing Africa; he tells that the title of the book will be “The Pacification of the Primitive Tribes of the Lower Niger” (Achebe 209).  The tragedy in this is that the book is spent discussing why the tribes aren’t as primitive as people think, yet it ends with a man discussing the book he plans to write which will only perpetuate the single story.
Similarly, in The Outsiders, there is another text that perpetuates the single story of the teenagers.  However, this text both supports and refutes the single story.  It is a newspaper article written after Dallas, Ponyboy, and Johnny save a group of children from a burning church; the headline is “JUVENILE DELINQUENTS TURN HEROES”.  Though it may seem like it’s portraying the boys in a positive light, it’s still referring to them as “juvenile delinquents” merely based on their age  and what they look like.  In addition, Two-Bit is offended because he argues that “[they] were heroes from the beginning.  [They] didn’t just ‘turn’ all of a sudden” (107).   Ponyboy and Johnny didn’t do anything in the first place to deserve the title of “juvenile delinquents”—they’re just delinquents by association, not because they did anything wrong.  This is similar to how people get their idea of Africa from minorities like Okonkwo instead of acknowledging that not everyone is like that.
Things Fall Apart and The Outsiders are very similar in that they were both created to challenge the single story, yet feature characters who completely embody it.  These characters are created by the authors in order to convey that their point isn’t that the single story is incorrect—it’s that it’s incomplete .  Both authors do an amazing job of portraying why these groups are so much more intelligent and complex than they’re given credit for being.

Monday, January 20, 2014

Things Fall Apart




History is just a bunch of stories about heroes against villains.  The good guys vs. the bad guys.  This is how every story goes... why would Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe be any different?

See, you have the good guys, who are the Africans, and then the bad guys, who are the white men.

Oh wait, no...  I'm sorry-- I meant to say that the good guys are the white men, and the bad guys are the Africans.

Wait that's definitely not right.  Okay, let's think this through:



According to the story, the people of Nigeria have a system that has been working for years.  They're happy, and they would never, not even for a second, doubt their government or religion.  They respect their gods, and live their lives according to their gods' will.

Then all of a sudden, a bunch of random white guys swoop in with total disregard for the culture of the Nigerians.  When they come to the village of Mbanta to preach, "[they tell them] that they [worship] false gods, gods of wood and stone" (Achebe 145).  The white men think it's literally their God-given duty to come to these people (who have been fine for the past hundreds of years!) and tell them that everything they believe in is a lie and that they need to change.


...So, obviously the imperialists are the bad guys, right?


Well, it's actually not that simple.  The thing is, these white guys truly do have the best of intentions.  Though they may be disrespecting the Africans' religion and culture, they aren't completely ignorant about it.  One of the white men says "All the gods you have named are not gods at all.  They are gods of deceit who tell you to kill your fellows and destroy innocent children" (146).  I mean, he has a point...

Also, according to Christianity, all of the Africans are destined to go to hell unless they convert.  The missionaries say, "We have been sent by this great God to ask you to leave your wicked ways and false gods and turn to Him so that you may be saved when you die" (145).  How bad of a guy can this priest be if all he wants is to save the Africans?

The missionaries also show love to outcasts, and save twin babies from dying.  So then that must mean they're the good guys...  Agreed?

Well wait, that's not fair.  I mean, the Umuofia and Mbanta people only casted out the osus and killed twin babies because in their culture, it's the right thing to do.

The Question:
Is a man who does bad things with good intentions a good guy or a bad guy?

Does this story even have good guys and bad guys?  Or is it just a bunch of people who may be misguided, but in the end are really all just trying to do the right thing...?

Maybe this whole "Good Guy, Bad Guy" thing is more complicated than I thought...